Tuesday, December 30, 2014

The Rosie Effect by Graeme Simsion



Love, love, love this book. I'm totally enamored with the protagonist, probably because I'm neuro-atypical in the same way he is. I also love the way that Simsion manages to make bizarre plot twists (rock star friend?) seem reasonably reasonable.

Review copy provided by publisher.

Monday, December 29, 2014

The Story of Dr. Dolittle by Hugh Lofting



I read this because I am now in charge of T's book group and this is our first book. I thought it was charming and inventive.

Thursday, December 25, 2014

Gray Mountain by John Grisham



Even for John Grisham, this was lame. Slow start, much exposition, no resolution to numerous plot strands.

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Edge of Eternity by Ken Follett



I'm always vaguely embarrassed by how much I enjoy his books.

Monday, December 08, 2014

The Case for Mark Composed in Performance by Antoinette Clark Wire



Wire was my thesis adviser and I'm interested in performance criticism of Mark, so I was pre-disposed to like this book. That said, anyone familiar with studies of the origins of the gospels will know that you can't expect an air-tight case for composition. On the other hand, her speculations about the ending of Mark were very provocative.

Thursday, December 04, 2014

The Ministry of Peter, the Chief Apostle (Sperry Symposium)



As with all essay collections, some of these essays are better than others. But, in general, the academic rigor of the Sperry Symposium is improving. There's some good stuff here. I am, of course, particularly pleased with the essay on Peter in Mark (by Eric Huntsman), which, as far as I can tell, is only the third article on any aspect of Mark from an LDS perspective to be published. (I suppose if you count my anointing article, that's four. And I have two more in the pipeline. But still.)

Review copy provided by publisher.

Tuesday, December 02, 2014

Jesus the Christ Study Guide by Holzapfel and Wayment



I don't think it is an exaggeration to say that James Talmage's Jesus the Christ (hereafter JTC) enjoys quasi-canonical status in the church. This fact makes many of my biblical studies friends cringe, because Elder Talmage's work reflects one-hundred-year-old scholarship--with all of its limitations and biases.

Richard Holzapfel and Thomas Wayment have written a study guide that attempts to bring modern scholarship, revelation, and sensibilities to the reader of JTC. After a brief introduction which explains their purpose, they devote one short chapter to each chapter of JTC. These chapters discuss advances in biblical scholarship, new LDS revelations, and also devote quite a bit of time to the Joseph Smith Translation and other teachings from Joseph Smith which were not available to Elder Talmage. They conclude each chapter with a few study questions. (I found the study questions pretty anodyne, although a few were thought-provoking.) While carefully honoring Elder Talmage at every turn, Holzapfel and Wayment are clearly more comfortable with ambiguity and less-than-perfect disciples than Talmage was.

There is no doubt that a reader of JTC would benefit immensely from this study guide. For example, Elder Talmage wrote that "the exact site of [Capernaum] is at present unknown . . . we shall probably never be able to know the exact fact." But as Holzapfel and Wayment point out, "additional evidence has been unearthed, and the site is no longer in dispute." This may seem a minor issue, but it is a good illustration of a fact that many people find hard to believe (or perhaps never considered): there really are new advances in the study of a two-thousand-year-old text. There are more significant updates as well: Elder Talmage assumed a hemispheric model for the Book of Mormon; Holzapfel and Wayment correctly indicate that most LDS no longer believe that. (Although it was unfortunate that Holzapfel and Wayment covered this issue in chapter 39 and not in chapter 5, where JTC first mentioned the hemispheric model.)

If the reader expects everything in JTC which is problematic to be addressed in the study guide, she will be disappointed. For example, Elder Talmage makes reference to Job 19:25 as an example of a prophecy of Jesus, but this is an extremely unlikely reading of that text; Holzapfel and Wayment don't address it. At another point, JTC argues that Matthew, Mark, and Luke had no knowledge of each other's texts; no modern scholar believes this; again, the study guide does not address it. In another instance, JTC argues that Peter was not "unlettered" and was "well-to-do;" I don't think most scholars would agree with that characterization (in fact, Mark seems to suggest precisely the opposite). While the study guide covers many of the issues in JTC to which a modern scholar would object, the reader should not therefore assume that everything problematic in JTC has been addressed.

Further, while the study guide does a good job in correcting now-dated observations, it does not provide to the reader any of the new insights of biblical scholarship. I realize that there are space limitations, but I'd hate for someone to read JTC and the study guide and feel that she now had had an introduction to modern scholarship. This would be akin to someone reading a geocentric textbook and then a pamphlet correcting it--but who hadn't had a heliocentric model explained to him. Sure, he won't believe the geocentric model anymore, but he has no idea of the new knowledge that is out there, its uses or its implications. Something as simple as suggested sources for further study at the end of the book or a few pages explaining the major trendlines of 20th- and early-21st- century New Testament scholarship would have been enormously helpful here.

I also noticed some editing infelicities in this book. At one point, they date the Talmud to the 4th and 5th centuries (xvi), but at another point date it to the 6th or 7th centuries (p30). Material about Peter as the rock (p103) appears in the chapter on the Transfiguration when it properly belongs in the previous chapter. At least one of the study questions seemed attached to the wrong chapter. And I believe the authors introduced a few errors of their own. And while biblical scholars are notorious for disagreeing, there are a few of what I would consider errors here. For example, at one point they write that Matthew was the only Gospel writer to gather parables together (p87), but Mark did the same. Later, they claim that no ancient manuscript has "rope" instead of "camel" (p124) in Jesus' statement about a camel going through the eye of a needle, but this is not the case (see Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, p40).

I also wonder about the reader's experience of working through JTC and the study guide. While Holzapfel and Wayment are extremely deferential to Elder Talmage and exceptionally subtle in their corrections of his work, it is nonetheless the case that virtually every page of the study guide remedies a flaw in JTC. So imagine a 19-year-old missionary reading JTC and then the study guide. She reads JTC and the study guide says, in effect if certainly not in tone, "Elder Talmage was wrong. An apostle was wrong. Wrong again. Wrong over here. Wrong about this as well." And while the approach of the authors is to frame Elder Talmage's work as not wrong but simply limited by his historical circumstances, there are many instances in the book--such as changing interpretations of Eve's role in the Fall--where real doctrinal shifts in LDS thought in the last century become obvious.  I suppose your sensibilities regarding the proper level of obedience to authority and attitudes toward (de facto) infallibility will determine whether you think this reading experience is a good one or a poor one for our missionary to have.

Which leads to the big question: does this book make sense? Or would it make more sense for JTC to quietly fade away? JTC is about 500 pages long--that's a big commitment. The study guide adds another 200 (although there is lots of white space). And for all that, virtually nothing from modern New Testament scholarship is covered (unless JTC happened to mention a topic that the study guide corrects). Are there 700 better pages to read on the New Testament? I think the answer to that question is certainly a yes. (Start with Jesus Christ and the World of the New Testament.)

And despite Holzapfel and Wayment's gentle correction, I would still be uncomfortable recommending that someone read JTC. Elder Talmage wrote before the Holocaust made the full price of anti-semitic biblical interpretation clear; his references to "wicked Jews" are, by modern standards, troubling. Also uncomfortable are his racially-tinged remarks about Native Americans. The study guide addresses attitudes toward the Jews, but I wonder if it is enough to counter-act what Elder Talmage writes and to justify exposing a new generation to these ideas. Also, JTC has the tendency common to its day of embroidering upon the biblical record by fleshing out details and suggesting motives and attitudes for various characters ("Mary's sensitive nature was pained" -- no gospel account says anything about the nature or emotional state of the woman who anointed Jesus), which, I think, makes it hard for the reader to avoid importing these extremely speculative details to further readings. These reasons might weigh in favor of allowing JTC to quietly retire.

Of course, my question here presumes that you can wave your magic wand and retire JTC. If you can't, the study guide's mission is amply justified. I also confess that I found something lovely about the idea of the study guide: instead of Holzapfel and Wayment arguing that JTC is past its sell-by date and the only thing left for it is the recycling bin, they instead chose to, in a sense, redeem the text by bringing it up to date. I imagine that if Elder Talmage were still alive, he would have done precisely the same thing in the wake of new discoveries, beliefs, and revelations. It is a lovely tribute to him and I love how they model respect for his apostolic office with a willingness to correct his work.

So: there are better books to read about Jesus than JTC. But if you are going to read JTC, you should read it with this study guide in hand.

The publisher provided me with a review copy of this book.

Cross-posted to Times & Seasons.

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Downton Abbey: Rules for Household Staff



I am probably the only person in the entire world who would adore a fake book describing the rules and procedures at Downton Abbey.

Review copy provided by publisher.

Sunday, November 23, 2014

All the Light We Cannot See by Anthony Doerr



Wow. This was amazing. Go read it.

Friday, November 21, 2014

Charles and Emma: The Darwins' Leap of Faith by Deborah Heiligman



Absolutely charming. One of the best books I have ever read to the boys.

Sunday, November 16, 2014

Rooms by Lauren Oliver



Lame. Totally lame.

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Someplace Safe with Somebody Good by Jan Karon



Karon's books are pretty much the literary equivalent of comfort food. (Recommended especially for people with no tolerance for anything PG--these are totally clean.)

Sunday, November 09, 2014

Thursday, November 06, 2014

Helen Andelin and the Fascinating Womanhood Movement by Julie Debra Neuffer



Fascinating. No, really. Especially her interaction with LDS church leaders.

Review copy provided by publisher.

Tuesday, November 04, 2014

A New York Christmas by Anne Perry



A nice little holiday story. Typical Perry: good plot, decent characters, a few surprises, and always more depth than you would expect from the genre.

Review copy provided by publisher.


Tuesday, October 28, 2014

The Book of Strange New Things by Michel Faber



This was definitely strange. A little sci-fi, a little theology, a little apocalypse, a little romance. Overall, I liked it quite a bit, but the ending was a smidge disappointing.

Review copy provided by publisher.

Friday, October 24, 2014

The Signature of All Things by Elizabeth Gilbert



On the one hand, this was flabby and sprawling. But on the other hand, parts of it were great.

Sunday, October 12, 2014

Handle with Care by Jodi Picoult



Started out strong but then got kind of lame.


Saturday, October 11, 2014

Hearing the Whole Story: The Politics of Plot in Mark's Gospel by Richard Horsley



I think liberationist and economic readings of Mark are very important, but this book just was not very good. Read Ched Myers instead.

Thursday, October 09, 2014

Mark as Story: Retrospect and Prospect ed. by Iverson and Skinner



This book is a reception history and exploratory extension of Mark as Story, which is one of the most important--and accessible--introductions to the modern study of Mark. So this book is pretty "inside baseball," and, while interesting, is definitely not a substitute for Mark as Story.

Saturday, September 27, 2014

The All-Girl Filling Station's Last Reunion by Fannie Flagg



OK, so this isn't great literature, but it was charming, quirky, and touching. Recommended.

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

Lincoln: A Photobiography by Russell Freedman



I read this to the boys. It was pretty good. The pictures are fascinating.

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen



I really enjoyed this. I assumed it might be too formulaic, but it wasn't.

Review copy provided by publisher.


Monday, September 15, 2014

Tuesday, September 09, 2014

The Children Act by Ian McEwan



I enjoyed the process of reading this; I thought it raised some provocative issues in a novel way; and yet, at the end, I was vaguely unsatisfied.

Review copy provided by publisher.

Blog Archive